Orderly and Peaceful Demonstration
3.022 viewsProtesters cheered enthusiastically-soray in front of burning old tires, they shouted happily yells, chided the government, as well as blocking the road. Not rare that even down the fence, pelting officers with stones, damaging even porperti government. Who is teaching? I think not a single religion that teaches this kind of action.
Orderly and peaceful demonstrations calling for no examples just nonsense. Because it lets us see one of the organizations that have done in an orderly and peaceful demonstration.
Here are excerpts from the Metro TV show that appeared on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELU_owC85PM
In the video looks MCC (Prosperous Justice Party) with the orderly march. And deliberately chose not to disrupt holiday resident activity. Since the famous martinet, it would not be surprised if many who brought along her children are still young.
Indeed in the demonstration MCC (Prosperous Justice Party) remained above the traffic snarl, but they tried as much as possible to minimize the negative impact of the demonstration to have it on a holiday.
Although already at peace, but I personally prefer being taught by the Prophet. Islam teaches how to criticize a more polite way of demonstration that even the most polite .
For non-Muslims, might be able to imitate the style of MCC above demonstration, so the demonstration can be more polite 
Authors: Agam Rosyidi
URL: http://rosyidi.com/ orderly demonstrations-demonstrations-and-peace-and-order-peace /
Reference: YouTube
Related Posts (Related Articles):- DemonStressy
- Prohibit Islamic Suicide Bombings
- Pay traffic tickets without trial and not a bribe
- Avoid Dealing with Green Table
- History of the Nation of Israel
- Easy Solutions Determining Hari Raya Idul Fitri
Send to a Friend on Facebook
agree mas, demo2 lately been leading anarchists and very worrisome, and the most severely disrupt the activities of common citizens ..
problems this country is so hard to find a solution. not just who among even younger than usual to drive the change was already many apt mild depression, irritability .. I think religion is the most appropriate solution to solve this country ..
I think there have to open and peaceful dialogue between students, government, religious leaders and economic experts in order to achieve convergence and sheep so that no fights between police and students in the tipi lagi.Capek ah ngliat demo2 mlulu contents
oh yes, gam.Satu again, good luck with the trial of his thesis yaaa ..? not wait for his treat klo already graduated
I salute each MCC even though I never vote for them in elections.
Example is in sight, why not try emulate ya ..
MCC nih wah promotion
, But I totally agree if the demo is indeed the idea and purpose tuk welfare of the people so properly at the level of practice does not make any trouble for many people.
wah, preceded neh ... no plan abis ngeritik ato demo adverse action crowd, damaging public facilities ... and also criticized for akhwat2 who liked the demo ...
Well, the point ... I totally agree deh ama ni writing ...
KayaknyaDemo awry too polite ditanggapidengan violence would not be considered a general interrupt
The Indonesian people are psychologically sick.
test
MCC residents keGRan
Yahh who more humiliating those who have a degree tuh anarchists' mahasiswa'kayaknya mereka2 who have not graduated so tu Pend subjects. Pancasila Moral 
nah, maybe like this who can who emulated.
Assalamu'alaikum. Bener tuh well, students should be able to voice their aspirations in the dialogues, public forums. But maslahnya, ABOVE WHAT THERE WILLING TO MATTERS THAT? For example, in every movement, students are always demanding to meet people "in the demo" or men'somasi "dialogue / letters should be addressed or the students took to the streets" such as demanding the president meet , or governor, etc. are invited to a dialogue ... ... ... ... klau this could keep the dialogue going on ... not going to publish the violence (obviously not the anarchist demo purpose), God willing, because everything was clear, did not God teach for deliberation ... ... maybe we should pray a lot yah mas let there be more sensitive than the leader, let alone the fuel is raised again, the poor will be reduced nih ... I think ... because if it objected to kill members of their families, many people have committed suicide ... ... only now I lef replies, salute deh make our dentist inisalut also created this site, critical and solutif enough, we must imitate the goodness of any ... ... ... yours respectfully.
Hopefully others can example.
Pancasila state we're not a liberal country, so do ya own good as klau demos so disturbing others
Mas agree, the demo should be polite. the good fight should be in good ways too. But to call this one: "For non-Muslims, might be able to imitate the style of MCC above demonstration, so the demonstration can be more polite" Not only non-Muslims, mas. Muslims also. FPI in particular. Is not that right, mas?
This one article I have ever read, I'm not on behalf of Islamic organizations, but should follow the example of Muslims leaders namely when there is a problem Prophet deliberation. "no protests / demonstrations peaceful or orderly." Islam is the advice "
The demonstration is a form of pagan Tasyabbuh
Written on August 25, 2007 by Abu Harun | Sunniy Salafy
Zuhair Sharif
Very regrettably, the demonstrators was the majority of them are Islamic activists. But why are they doing this? Where is their Islamic characteristics? On what grounds do that? Is based or based on doubtful proposition (vagueness of understanding)? They -mahasiswa/rakyat-Moslems, are not aware that they have committed acts prohibited by the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam, their lord: the prohibition resembling the unbelievers. He sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam proclaim: "Whoever imitates a people, so they include these people." Problems include forms tasyabbuh demonstration against the infidel.
It has been explained by Shaykh Al-Albani hafidhahullah when a questioner submitted a question to him that such details:
Questioner: "What is the ruling demonstrations / protests, such as adolescents, men and women out into the streets?"
Sheikh: "The women, too?"
Questioner: "Right! Indeed this has happened. "
Shaykh: "Masha'Allah."
Questioner: "They went out into the streets in order to oppose some of the problems is demanded or commanded by a person they consider to Evil, Evil, or what they demand from organizations / political parties are in conflict with them. What are the consequences of this act? "
Shaykh: "I say-wabillahi Taufiq-enter the answer to this question on the rules in the words of the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallamyang issued by Abu Dawood in his Sunan from Abd Allah ibn' Amr ibn 'Ash radliyallahu' anhu or hadeeth of Ibn 'Umar radliyallahu' anhuma - I doubt whether he was' Abdullah bin 'Amr Ibn Umar-or, he said: Messenger of Allah sallallaahu' alaihi wa sallam said: "I was sent with the sword until shortly before the Day of Resurrection until only Allah is worshiped, there were no allies for Him. And God made rezekiku under the auspices of the spear, made by humility and smallness of people who menyelisihi government. Whoever imitates a people then he belongs to their families. "Who made the proposition of the utterance, he sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam These are the words: Whoever imitates a people then he belonged to their families."
So tasyabbuh (resemblance) of a Muslim to an infidel is not permissible in Islam. Tasyabbuh to a Gentile there is some level of legal terms. The highest and the lowest is haram is Makruh. This problem has been described in detail by Shaykh al-Islam in his book is great, Iqtidla `Shiratal Mustaqîm, Mukhalafata Ashabil Jahim, in detail and will not be obtained other than he may Allaah have mercy. I want to warn other things, to be appropriate for scientific thalibul attention in order not to think that only tasyabbuh Shari'a are prohibited.
There is another case-a more subtle-that is, orders to menyelisihi infidels. Tasyabbuh to the infidels is to run their favorite. As for the unbelievers menyelisihi is menyelisihi you intend them on what we and they do it but they do not change this. Like something that is set with a natural determination. So this is a natural assessment, which did not differ between Muslims and infidels, for verily in this ordinance, no effort and the will of the creature. Because this is sunnatullah tabarak wa Ta'ala to mankind, and you will not find sunnatullah that changed. As was authentic from the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam: "Verily, the Jews and Christians do not dye their hair, then they selisihi (2x)." Indeed, in this case resemble those of a believer may disbelieve in the case of gray. And there is no difference. You will not find a Muslim that is not gray but very few. There are similarities here between Muslims and appearance equally reject both of them do not own / manage as we said earlier. Then the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam commanded us to menyelisihi the polytheists, ie, with gray hair dye our hair. Same hair, beard or head. For what? In order to be seen the difference between Muslims and infidels. So what was the point when, if an infidel does a practice, then a Muslim go do it and are influenced by their deeds? This error is more severe than menyelisihi. In this issue, I warned him before entering the discussion in explaining the answer to that directed at me. If you already know the difference between tasyabbuh with penyelisihan, the Islamic right of a Muslim should try to stay away bertasyabbuh continuous with the Gentiles. Instead they should try menyelisihi. For this reason we menyunnahkan (used) put the watch in his right hand, because they are the first to create a watch to wear on his left hand.
We take istinbath Thus, based greeting Prophet 'alayhi wa sallam: "So different from them." You know this hadith, "that Jews and Christians and do not polish their hair, so different from them." As was said by Shaykh al-Islam in the book (iqtidla ). Greeting the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam: "So different from them," is suggesting hujjah penyelisihan against unbelievers, as desired by the As-Sami'ul' Alim (Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala) and realized in everyday life . Therefore, we find in practice penyelisihan practices and laws not include mandatory. Like eating the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam or, "you Shalatlah over your slippers," "Be different from the Jews (2x)." Here, to know that prayer is not fardlu wear sandals. Differences with elongate his beard, because people who shave will get sin. As for praying with the case which bersandal is sunnah (mustahab). But if a Muslim did not wear sandals constantly when praying, it has menyelisihi sunnah, and not the Jewish menyelisihi.
There are some things to note here as in the history of Ibn Mas'ud tawadlu attitude when he invited Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari mengimami prayer time. Though the main position of Ibn Mas'ud, Abu Musa more radliyallahu 'anhu. At that time Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari took off his sandals, and immediately rebuked strongly by Ibn Mas'ud. "Is not this act of the Jews? Do you consider yourself there in the valley of Mount purified? "Speech This confirms the word of Ibn Mas'ud, the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam," Shalatlah on top of your sandals and different from the Jews! "
When two of this nature have been understood, namely (ban) tasyabbuh and (command) menyelisihi the polytheists, then mandatory for us to stay clear of any and all forms of behavior kesyirikan kufr.
Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam said: "How you guys really going to follow the paths taken by those before you span by span, cubit by cubit, even if they are down or go into the hole you have any lizards undoubtedly will enter it. "
News from the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam contains a warning for this race. But besides that the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam also said in the hadith mutawatir: "There will always be a group from my Ummah who appeared al-haq. People who do not harm them come menyelisihi them until doomsday. "
So the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam has given the glad tidings in the saheeh hadeeth is that this race continues to be in good condition. When this news came, that "you guys really going to follow the roads before you," the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam in this hadith means every individual of his flock would follow the path of the infidels. So saying that meaningful warning means "be careful you guys, do not follow the sunnah of people before you. And indeed there will be those of you who do. "
In another narration in addition to As-Shahihain history, the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam described the deeds of the Jews at a level that is severe. Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam said (in the history of it): "Even some of them (Jews) who came (menzinahi) mother in the middle of the road, and there will undoubtedly also one of you is going to do."
The trend these days has proved the truth of the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam, although it needs more in-depth research. And in some hadiths that have been Thabit Prophet 'alayhi wa sallam said, "It will not happen until the Day of Judgement is between humans copulate like donkeys bersetubuhnya in the streets." This is the culmination ugliness tasyabbuh against infidels.
If you already know bertasyabbuh prohibitions and commands to menyelisihi (infidels), then back to the problem of demonstrations (protests), we have witnessed with my own eyes when France controlled Syria and what happened in Algeria. There are astray and tasyabbuh with the participation of women in the demonstration.
Such is the perfection tasyabbuh against unbelievers, whether male or female. Because, we look through the photos, or news by radio and television or in others, about the release of thousands of people from among the unbelievers Africa and Syria and others. According to the expression of the people of Sham, a family man and a woman in a state of "meleit temkit". Meleit temkit means they squeeze between the back with the back, or hips with the hips and others. I would say in terms of other (related to the demonstration): Behold the demonstration, showing dogmatic attitude toward unbelievers in order to reject the laws set by their judges. European-style demonstrations taklidiyah manner (the bandwagon) from among the Muslims, not including syar'i way to improve the legal and social conditions. From here every jama'a hizbiyah, the Islamic group has clearly made a big mistake because it does not browse the path of the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam changing circumstances in society.
Nothing in the rules of Islam changed situation in the community by way of clustered-Cluster, shouting and demonstrations (protests). Islam teaches peace, by teaching science among the Muslims as well as educate them on Islamic law to succeed, despite having a very long time.
By this I say very briefly, demonstrations and protests that occurred in some Islamic countries on the road home is a distortion of the believers [6] and tasyabbuh (resembling) pagan groups. Truly God has said (which means): "And whoever opposes the Messenger after the obvious truth for him, and follow the path that is not the way of the believers, We let him in power against error that they have learned it and We put him into Hell and Jahannam it was the worst place again. "(An-Nisa: 115)
Questioner: "They-the demonstrators argue with the proposition-Sirah (history of the Prophet), that after Umar radliyallahu 'anhu to Islam, the Muslims (in unison) exit. Umar Hamzah in a row was in another row. So they (the pro demonstration) said the demonstration was to deny the Evil-Evil and Quraish infidels. How do you answer with a proposition like this? "
Answer: The answer to such pendalilan is: How many times do these demonstrations occurred in the Islamic community (first)? Only one time. Whereas Sirah is sunnah that followed, according to jurisprudence scholars. They say if Thabit from Apostle sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam which is prescribed for a religious service, will be rewarded people who did it. And its implementation should not be any continuously without interruption because it was feared the case resembles the length of time required to cause.
Most humans,-according to their custom-Muslims if there is one left the sunnah like this, will undoubtedly vehemently denied. According to the Jurist. So what if there was a glimpse of events that occur at a particular time as mentioned in the above Sirah, then made the sunnah that followed, even hujjah pledged to support what is done by the unbelievers continuously, while the Muslims do not necessarily except during the course [7].
We know most governments have laws that come out of Islam and human sometimes imprisoned with dhalim and exceed limits, then how the attitude of the Muslims in this case? Apostle sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam has ordered in a saheeh hadeeth is obligatory to obey [8] to the government even though he took the treasure and beat back. But in reality not a demonstration of obedience to the government as outlined by the Prophet sallallaahu 'alaihi wa sallam.
This is what I worry about what is called the "resurrection (shahwah) voice of truth", how are we going to meridlainya? How could a "resurrection" (shahwah) with feelings, not by science? Yet science is what makes the case was considered good or bad.
No doubt in Algeria and in every Muslim country, this shahwah born of Muslim youth after they "wake from sleep". But you'll see them walking on the street that shows them in their studies ketidakgigihan God 'Almighty.
We do not prolong the discussion. Suffice to say we are taking them to this theorem shows their ignorance of Islamic fiqh terhadp as we have indicated on the front. This instantaneous events that cross the mind of me and I remembered that this incident was recorded in Sirah. But I have not been able to find this correct or not current. If history is saheeh sanadnya and there one of you find this history on the books of hadith standards, please warn me. So I can check maybe sirah history of demonstrations in the saheeh. So if saheeh, only performed one time only. If there is only one, certainly can not be a sunnah. Moreover, when the demonstrations are now more often carried out by those infidels who should be the Muslims menyelisihinya.
This event was conducted by the infidels and then we followed him. Hanafiyah clerics have made a foothold in fiqhiyah problem that there is a problem which is the sunnah of Muhammadiyah which should not be abandoned, the Sunnah Sajadah read a letter on Friday morning (when the dawn prayer). This is contained in Shahihain (Bukhari and Muslim). Nevertheless Hanafiyah scholars advocated the priests to occasionally leave the mosque, was worried when continuously be carried out among ordinary people, the ruling will be lifted out of the legal origin.
We have evidence that supports the accuracy of the fiqh of the sunnah and the understanding of this. I strongly think that the imam at the mosque of Damascus, namely Bani Umayyad mosque, mengimami shubuh prayers at the mosque and he did not read the letter Sajadah. Recently priests greetings, they suddenly snapped and went to the priest, saying: "Why did you not read the prayer rug?" Then he explained that it is sunnah, and sometimes encouraged to leave.
This incident occurred because the mosque imam practice these deeds continuously and lasts long. And then he does not do these deeds.
Even more strange was happening to me. One day I was on the way from Damascus approximately 60 km to Madhaya. So I stopped in the morning Friday to pray in congregation with the Muslims there. When the priest did not come. So they find a suitable replacement priest. They did not find a replacement except me. At that time I was young and my beard just grew. In a confused state, they told me to move forward. I actually have not memorized the letter Sajadah well, then I read the letters of Mary. I read two pages earlier. When I Takbir for bowing, so I feel all the congregation even prostration. It shows because of what? Because of customs (ie, they bowed down recitations because of habit and not by science, ed).
Priests should keep the state of society in order not ghuluw (exaggerated) in some laws. Then explain that the issue of Shari'a, are obliged to be taken without unreasonable attitude to raise the degree of legal Sunnah became mandatory, and conversely that must be a sunnah. All this is ifrath and tafrith which is not allowed. Here's my answer to pendalilan (Umar history above) that shows the stupidity of people who take the proposition to him. "(Fatawa Jedda Cassette no. 89 980, the morning dawn, hours of Sunday 27 Jumada al-End 1410 H).
Source: Magazine Salafy rubric Mabhats XXVII/1419 edition H / 1998 M
[6] shahabat, ed.
[7] This is evidence that the shahabat, Tabi'in, tabi'it Tabi'in and so do not take it as Sunnah in order to deny the government.
[8] Obedient in the sense of rebellion and escape from baiat with permanent leave and do not obey in disobedience disobedience
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..
think first ahhhhh
Myspace here again